{"id":1260,"date":"2018-09-21T06:21:58","date_gmt":"2018-09-21T10:21:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.harringtonlawassociates.com\/?p=1260"},"modified":"2018-10-11T15:24:08","modified_gmt":"2018-10-11T19:24:08","slug":"tax-controversy-part-ii-audit-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/tax-controversy-part-ii-audit-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Tax Controversy: Part II\u2014Audit"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">If you have managed to land on the IRS&#8217; (or Department of Revenue&#8217;s) radar, and the agent is conducting an examination of your return, you are undoubtedly considering your options. \u00a0This article is intended to give you an idea of what to expect and some of the <a href=\"http:\/\/info.harringtonlawassociates.com\/blog\/tax-controversy-part-i-%E2%80%93-overview\">key considerations<\/a> along the way.<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">There are three main types of audit: Correspondence, Office, and Field.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A \u00abcorrespondence\u00bb audit is conducted largely by mail. \u00a0This is the kind of examination used for most individual and small business taxpayers. \u00a0A correspondence audit is limited to issues that can be verified from records that can be forwarded to the examining agent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The agent will send you a letter requesting information or explaining how the return needs to be corrected. \u00a0If you agree with the agent&#8217;s analysis, you can just pay the difference and move on with your life. \u00a0Even if you disagree with the analysis, you may decide it&#8217;s not worth paying an accountant or attorney to fight and you will pay . . . and move on with your life.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This article is aimed a helping those who disagree with the agent&#8217;s position&#8211;or are <em>hoping<\/em>, at least, the agent is wrong&#8211; and who are not willing to just go ahead and pay.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An \u00aboffice\u00bb audit is where the agent will request you meet with the agent at an IRS office. \u00a0You do not actually have to go in person. \u00a0Your accountant or <a href=\"https:\/\/myhla.wpengine.com\/areas-of-practice\/tax-controversy\/\">lawyer <\/a>can appear on your behalf . . . and that would almost certainly be better.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If you are asked to come to the agent&#8217;s office, there should be a description of the issue(s) under scrutiny and the documents the agent needs to review. \u00a0Essentially, the agent has doubts about the tax treatment in your return and will be looking for documentation to support your position. \u00a0If you do not have the documentation&#8211;or the information you have does not support your position&#8211;then, obviously, the agent will try to disallow your tax treatment and ask you to pay the difference.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Field audits are reserved for the largest and most complex returns, usually those of large companies. \u00a0These taxpayers probably have a team of tax professionals and are not reading this article, so the focus here will be on the correspondence and office audits.<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"Florida Litigation Firm: Harrington Law Associates\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Y7NfuBgzTh0?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Establish a Rapport<\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Look, don&#8217;t antagonize the examining agent.\u00a0\u00a0You do not have time to be audited, you&#8217;re unhappy about the money it&#8217;s going to cost you, and you don&#8217;t need the extra stress.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All that is certainly understandable. \u00a0The agent maybe even gets it, but that is not going to keep her from doing her job. \u00a0 In fact, the opposite is more likely to be true. \u00a0The agent may decide to open the scope of the audit, which is only going to mean more time, more money and more stress.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If you are going to be irritable, then you really need to do yourself a favor and stay away from the agent. \u00a0Let your accountant or <a href=\"https:\/\/myhla.wpengine.com\/areas-of-practice\/tax-controversy\/\">attorney <\/a>do the talking. \u00a0Nothing good will come from getting the agent&#8217;s dander up.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Now, that said, there <strong><em>is<\/em> <\/strong>a flip-side to that coin. \u00a0Agents are themselves subject to human frailties, and they sometimes use techniques, too.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">You may find your agent is irrational, intimidating, unresponsive, accusatory, sarcastic . . .<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It happens. \u00a0If you have this kind of experience, it is time to seriously consider bringing in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1N6jqZok-pM\">tax attorney<\/a>. \u00a0Accountants are very good at what they do and may be a bit less expensive. \u00a0But, let&#8217;s face it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It would be a very exceptional accountant who will put his foot down with an IRS agent. \u00a0They don&#8217;t really have the wherewithal for\u00a0that sort of thing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Accountants don&#8217;t have the weapons to put up a lot of resistance, nor is it in their interest to do so. \u00a0First of all, the accountant really wants to maintain a good relationship with the agent and everyone in the local IRS office. \u00a0Second, the accountant cannot litigate. \u00a0If the accountant goes over the agent&#8217;s head, he is probably going to escalate himself right out of the picture. \u00a0That is just a something of which you need to be aware.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">That brings us to another key issue.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Controlling the flow of information<\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As soon as the process started, you wanted it over with, right? \u00a0The last thing you want is for the scope of the audit to increase. \u00a0This is a damage-control situation. \u00a0You need to carefully limit the issues the examining agent scrutinizes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I do not mean to pick on accountants but, again, there are some realities of which you need to be aware. \u00a0There actually are rules about the information the IRS or DOR can force you to turnover. \u00a0You actually do have some recourse you can use for leverage, and you can safely push-back when it comes to the information being requested.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A <a href=\"https:\/\/myhla.wpengine.com\/areas-of-practice\/tax-controversy\/\">tax controversy attorney<\/a> is a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1N6jqZok-pM\">litigator <\/a>knows the rules of evidence inside and out and feels perfectly comfortable pointing out to an agent&#8211;who is not an attorney&#8211;that a request is outside the bounds. \u00a0That can be a very important advantage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Also, you <strong><em>can<\/em> <\/strong>escalate. \u00a0You can ask to deal with the agent&#8217;s manager, you can get to an appeals officer, and you can file a petition in tax court. \u00a0Obviously, you want to avoid the extra complications&#8211;so does the agent. \u00a0The fact that you have a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1N6jqZok-pM\">tax attorney<\/a> who is willing and able to go the distance if necessary gives you a strategic advantage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Your accountant is probably going to encourage you to turn over anything and everything the agent requests. \u00a0Your attorney will respectfully object to the agent&#8217;s request and cite to the rule or statute that supports his position.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">That is how you limit the scope of the scrutiny and take some control over the process.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If any of this sounds like your situation, contact us for a <a href=\"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/free-consultation\/\">free consultation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>~ <a href=\"https:\/\/myhla.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/Harrington-Bio_020818.pdf\">Jeff Harrington, Esq.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you have managed to land on the IRS&#8217; (or Department of Revenue&#8217;s) radar, and the agent is conducting an examination of your return, you are undoubtedly considering your options. \u00a0This article is intended to give you an idea of what to expect and some of the key considerations along the way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2263,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[51,1,220],"tags":[542,545,277,278,175,258,259,544,273,174,543,251,252,33],"class_list":["post-1260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business","category-media_mentions","category-tax","tag-abogado-jeff-harrington-es","tag-harrington-legal-alliance-es-3","tag-audit-defense","tag-fight-irs","tag-harrington-law","tag-harrington-law-associates","tag-harrington-legal","tag-harrington-legal-alliance-es-2","tag-irs-audit","tag-jeff-harrington","tag-abogado-jeff-harrington-es-2","tag-jeffrey-harrington","tag-jeffrey-harrington-esq","tag-tax-controversy"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1260\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2263"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myhlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}